Independent bibliographic reference

This is an editorial guide to a paper published by the Journal of Speech Sciences. JoSS Kids Lab does not represent the journal, its authors or UNICAMP. The original paper is hosted by its publisher.

Clinical phonetics · 2011

Voice quality and voice dynamics data: acoustic and perceptual correlates of speech of a child using a cochlear implant

Aline Neves Pessoa, Beatriz Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Caiuby Novaes, Lilian Kuhn Pereira, Zuleica Antonia Camargo
Journal of Speech Sciences · 1(2), 17-33 · 2011

Read the official article and PDF ↗

What the paper examines

This case study combines acoustic and perceptual analyses of speech samples from one child using a cochlear implant. It examines voice quality and voice dynamics in recordings collected at two ages during therapy sessions.

Reading it in context

A single-child study provides detailed observations rather than a population norm. Clinical recordings and specialist analyses cannot be replaced by an uncalibrated browser microphone game.

A question to read with

How do the acoustic measures and the perceptual observations complement each other?

Citation

Aline Neves Pessoa, Beatriz Cavalcanti de Albuquerque Caiuby Novaes, Lilian Kuhn Pereira, Zuleica Antonia Camargo (2011). Voice quality and voice dynamics data: acoustic and perceptual correlates of speech of a child using a cochlear implant. Journal of Speech Sciences, 1(2), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v1i2.15024

Resolve the DOI ↗

Source and reuse information

Title, authors, issue, pages, DOI and license were checked against the official publisher record on October 29, 2026. The year above is the original issue year; migration dates in online catalogues can differ. The publisher lists CC BY 4.0. We link to the original work and provide our own editorial summary; we do not host the paper or its figures.

Explore communication together

The voice and rhythm activities and family guidance offer educational starting points. They were not evaluated by this paper and are not substitutes for clinical assessment.

← More research references